The Jihadis are Coming Home: A Heavy Burden for Everyone
What should a small country with limited means like Tunisia do if and when more than 6,000 determined jihadists return from Syria? Should they be welcomed to their native land or should they be stripped of their citizenship? Should they go to jail upon arrival? The set of questions I pose here haunts both the government and the people of Tunisia who do not want their country to become a breeding ground for terrorism. After all, it was the made in Tunisia terrorism that was at the root of the Nice blood bath last year and indeed the Berlin carnage this year. Both radicalized men came from Tunisia: Mohammed Bouhlel and Anis Amri. The sun seems to have gone down on Tunisie la Douce. Its people, once known for their gentleness, are branded as terrorists.
After many years of civil war in Syria but also in Iraq, many so-called “soldiers of Islam” would like to return to Tunisia. Many of them are married to more than one woman and have had many children whom they want to live in a safe place where they can be at peace. The government has to statue over their cases because it fears a backlash from the people of Tunisia who want to keep them at bay. It is an enormous challenge for the country.
The people of Tunisia also fear civil unrest at home for they still have in memory what happened to neighboring Algeria in 1990s when Algerian fighters returned home from Afghanistan. They recall the bloody civil war which cost that country more than 400,000 lives, not to mention the one million Algerians who left their homeland to settle elsewhere. The death of my friend Tahar Djaout, a brilliant poet in the tradition of García Lorca, gunned down in May 1993 in the heart of Algiers, remains an open wound even today.
Many people in Tunisia think that the International Court of Justice in The Hague should take care of the matter (i.e.) try all those who left Tunisia after the advent of the 2011-Revolution to fight in Syria. But the question remains: What about the very people who were governing Tunisia at the time, shouldn’t they also be triedl? I am thinking of the quartet: the then Prime Minister Hamadi Jbali, Minister of the Interior Ali Larayd, Cheik Rached Ghannouchi, and President Moncef Marzouki. All four facilitated the exit of so many young men and women drunk with Jihadism to set off for Syria. The recent trial of the still pro-active Imed Dghij (from the suburbs of Tunis) reminds all of us of the existential threat that those people pose for a country like Tunisia; a country struggling to come to grips with the reality on the ground: unemployment, desperation, corruption, religiosity, marginalization, poverty—the perfect brew for social unrest. One can only surmise that the decision to let the Jihadis go home is recipe for disaster insofar as the country has neither the means nor the time to deal with the matter. It is busy trying hard to take care of the wounds of the past—unemployment among them. That they should go back to the country of their birth, be tried according to the new constitution, and if found guilty, go to jail is a claim many Tunisians oppose vehemently. Those who argue that they must face justice in the Netherlands make a good point insofar as they are a threat not only to Tunisia but to the whole world as well and only a capable court like the International Court of Justice at The Hague is able to see to a matter of this importance.
The times have indeed changed, haven’t they! Half a century ago, young people leaned toward the Left because they saw in it a measure of hope: social justice, equal sharing of wealth, and a certain utopia for a better life for all. It was an idealistic view of the world. Today, young people, from the Islamic world in particular, are filled with hatred. Their sole aim is to kill, maim, or blow themselves up in the middle of crowds of innocent people. Their intention is vengeful in that they see themselves as the guardians of a banner that says: “We Kill in the Name of Islam”; a beleaguered religion they are bent on safeguarding from Western incursion by any means.